Academic superstars: competent or lucky?

Citation data:

Synthese, ISSN: 0039-7857, Page: 1-20

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 89
Downloads 89
Captures 11
Readers 11
Social Media 290
Shares, Likes & Comments 224
Tweets 66
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12459
DOI:
10.1007/s11229-016-1146-5
Author(s):
Remco Heesen
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature, Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Tags:
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
I show that the social stratification of academic science can arise as a result of academics’ preference for reading work of high epistemic value. This is consistent with a view on which academic superstars are highly competent academics, but also with a view on which superstars arise primarily due to luck. I argue that stratification is beneficial if most superstars are competent, but not if most superstars are lucky. I also argue that it is impossible to tell whether most superstars are in fact competent or lucky, or which group a given superstar belongs to, and hence whether stratification is overall beneficial.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.