Epistemically Detrimental Dissent: Contingent Enabling Factors v. Stable Difference Makers.

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 70
Downloads 70
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12526
Author(s):
Le Bihan, Soazig; Amadi, Iheanyi
conference paper description
The aim of this paper is to critically build on Justin Biddle and Anna Leuschner’s characterization (2015) of epistemologically detrimental dissent (EDD) in the context of science. We argue that the presence of non-epistemic agendas and severe non-epistemic consequences are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions for EDD to obtain. We clarify their role by arguing that they are contingent enabling factors, not stable difference-makers, in the production of EDD. We maintain that two stable difference-makers are core to the production of EDD: production of skewed science and effective public dissemination.