Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12550
Author(s):
S. Brian Hood
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
conference paper description
In contrast to Borsboom (2008) who distinguishes between manifest and latent variables on epistemic grounds in terms of “epistemic accessibility,” I advocate a demarcation on pragmatic grounds. The latter way of understanding this distinction does justice to the intuitions driving Borsboom’s account, but avoids unnecessary epistemic complications. I then turn to two cases, the Flynn Effect and the case of psycho-educational assessment, and show an equivocal understanding of one latent variable, Spearman’s g, has led some researchers to draw paradoxical conclusions regarding cognitive ability.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.