Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12558
Author(s):
Vadim Keyser
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
conference paper description
Scientists often use multiple independent methods of identification to distinguish reliable results from those produced in error (artifacts). This process is referred to as ‘robustness analysis’. I argue that even though robustness analysis is useful for differentiating natural phenomena from artifacts, it fails to differentiate experimentally produced effects from artifacts. I argue that to bypass this problem, we can re-frame the role of robustness analysis to focus on cross-comparison between methods of production. Focusing on the production relation provides information about how changes in conditions alter given effects, without first having to make a distinction between effect and artifact.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.