Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12565
Author(s):
Daniel Burnston
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
conference paper description
In discussion of mechanisms, philosophers often debate about whether quantitative descriptions of generalizations or qualitative descriptions of operations are explanatorily fundamental. I argue that these debates have erred by conflating the explanatory roles of generalizations and patterns. Patterns are types of quantitative relationships that hold between quantities in a mechanism, over time and/or across conditions. While these patterns must often be represented in addition to descriptions of operations in order to explain a phenomenon, they are not equivalent to generalizations, because their explanatory role does not depend on any specific facts about their scope or domain of invariance.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.