Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12602
Author(s):
Dimitris Tsementzis
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
Structuralist foundations of mathematics aim for an “invariant” conception of mathematics. But what should be their basic objects? Two leading answers emerge: higher groupoids or higher categories. In this paper I argue in favor of the former over the latter. First, I explain why to pick between them we need to ask the question of what is the correct “categorified” version of a set. Second, I argue in favor of groupoids over categories as “categorified” sets by introducing a pre-formal understanding of groupoids as abstract shapes. This conclusion lends further support to the perspective taken by the Univalent Foundations of mathematics.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.