Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12767
Author(s):
D. Tulodziecki
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
It has recently been suggested (for example, Lyons 2006) that realist responses to historical cases featured in pessimistic meta-inductions are not as successful as previously thought. In response, selective realists have updated the basic divide et impera strategy specifically to take such cases into account and to argue that more modern realist accounts are immune to the historical challenge (cf. Vickers 2013). Using a case-study – that of the 19th century zymotic theory of disease – I argue that these updated proposals fail and that even the most sophisticated recent realist accounts remain vulnerable to the challenge from history.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.