Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12801
Author(s):
Jan Sprenger, Jacob Stegenga
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
conference paper description
Data from medical research is typically summarized with various types of outcome measures. We present three arguments in favor of absolute over relative outcome measures. The first argument is from cognitive bias: relative measures promote the reference class fallacy and the overestimation of treatment effectiveness. The second argument is decision-theoretic: absolute measures are superior to relative measures for making a decision between interventions. The third argument is causal: interpreted as measures of causal strength, absolute measures satisfy a set of desirable properties, but relative measures don't. Absolute outcome measures outperform relative measures on all counts.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.