Prediction in general relativity

Citation data:

Synthese, ISSN: 0039-7857, Vol: 194, Issue: 2, Page: 491-509

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 87
Downloads 83
Abstract Views 3
Link-outs 1
Captures 3
Readers 3
Social Media 81
Shares, Likes & Comments 81
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12829
DOI:
10.1007/s11229-015-0954-3
Author(s):
C. D. McCoy
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature, Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Tags:
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
article description
Several authors have claimed that prediction is essentially impossible in the general theory of relativity, the case being particularly strong, it is said, when one fully considers the epistemic predicament of the observer. Each of these claims rests on the support of an underdetermination argument and a particular interpretation of the concept of prediction. I argue that these underdetermination arguments fail and depend on an implausible explication of prediction in the theory. The technical results adduced in these arguments can be related to certain epistemic issues, but can only be misleadingly or mistakenly characterized as related to prediction.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.