What’s Wrong With Aim-Oriented Empiricism?

Citation data:

Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, ISSN: 2228-2009, Vol: 3, Issue: 2, Page: 5-31

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 71
Downloads 71
Social Media 22
Shares, Likes & Comments 18
Tweets 4
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12858
Author(s):
Nicholas Maxwell
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
For four decades it has been argued that we need to adopt a new conception of science called aim-oriented empiricism. This has far-reaching implications and repercussions for science, the philosophy of science, academic inquiry in general, the conception of rationality, and how we go about attempting to make progress towards as good a world as possible. Despite these far-reaching repercussions, aim-oriented empiricism has so far received scant attention from philosophers of science. Here, sixteen objections to the validity of the argument for aim-oriented empiricism are subjected to critical scrutiny.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.