What’s Wrong With Aim-Oriented Empiricism?
- Citation data:
Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, ISSN: 2228-2009, Vol: 3, Issue: 2, Page: 5-31
- Publication Year:
- Usage 87
- Downloads 87
- PhilSci-Archive 87
- Repository URL:
- Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
For four decades it has been argued that we need to adopt a new conception of science called aim-oriented empiricism. This has far-reaching implications and repercussions for science, the philosophy of science, academic inquiry in general, the conception of rationality, and how we go about attempting to make progress towards as good a world as possible. Despite these far-reaching repercussions, aim-oriented empiricism has so far received scant attention from philosophers of science. Here, sixteen objections to the validity of the argument for aim-oriented empiricism are subjected to critical scrutiny.