Teorías de la referencia, filosofía experimental y calibración de intuiciones

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 32, Issue: 1, Page: 41-62

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 87
Downloads 45
HTML Views 22
Abstract Views 17
Link-outs 3
Social Media 2
Tweets 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12875
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.15463
Author(s):
Manuel Pérez Otero
Publisher(s):
UPV/EHU Press, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
E. Machery and some collaborators have used survey data to criticize Kripke's anti-descriptivism about proper names. I highlight a number of drawbacks in the tests of Machery et al. Some of my objections concern their ambiguity. In particular, the responses that -according to them- reveal descriptivist intuitions can be interpreted as anti-descriptivist responses, for reasons that -as far as I know- have not been pointed out so far. Furthermore, their vignettes are apparently inconsistent. I also discuss other issues related to the role of intuitions in philosophy; Machery et al.'s theses depend on an unjustified assumption: there is not expertise regarding intuitions.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.