Stop making sense of Bell's theorem and nonlocality? A reply to Stephen Boughn
- Publication Year:
- Usage 111
- Downloads 111
- PhilSci-Archive 111
- Repository URL:
- Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
In a recent paper on Foundations of Physics Stephen Boughn argued that quantum mechanics does not require nonlocality of any kind and that the common interpretation of Bell theorem as a nonlocality result is based on a misunderstanding. In this note I argue that the Boughn arguments, that summarize views widespread in certain areas of the foundations of quantum mechanics, are based on an incorrect reading of the presuppositions of the EPR argument and the Bell theorem and, as a consequence, are totally unfounded.