Molyneux’s Question in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision

Citation data:

THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science, ISSN: 0495-4548, Vol: 32, Issue: 2, Page: 231-247

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 49
Downloads 22
Abstract Views 18
Full Text Views 9
Social Media 112
Shares, Likes & Comments 110
Tweets 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13135
DOI:
10.1387/theoria.15984
Author(s):
Juan R. Loaiza
Publisher(s):
UPV/EHU Press, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea / Universidad del País Vasco
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
I propose a reading of Berkeley's Essay towards a New Theory of Vision in which Molyneux-type questions are interpreted as thought experiments instead of arguments. First, I present the general argumentative strategy in the NTV, and provide grounds for the traditional reading. Second, I consider some roles of thought experiments, and classify Molyneux-type questions in the NTV as constructive conjectural thought experiments. Third, I argue that (i) there is no distinction between Weak and Strong Heterogeneity theses in the NTV; (ii) that Strong Heterogeneity is the basis of Berkeley's theory; and (iii) that Molyneux-type questions act as illustrations of Strong Heterogeneity.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.