Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13144
Author(s):
Tushar Menon, Thomas Moller-Nielsen, James Read
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
In his paper, ‘Regarding the ‘Hole Argument”, Weatherall suggests that models of general relativity related by a hole diffeomorphism must be regarded as being physically equivalent. At a later stage in the paper, however, he also argues that there is a sense in which two such models may be regarded as being empirically distinct—a fortiori physically distinct. We attempt to delineate the logic behind these two prima facie contradictory claims. We argue that the latter sense rests upon a misunderstanding of the import of shift arguments in the foundations of spacetime theories.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.