Comparing classical and relativistic kinematics in first-order logic
- Publication Year:
- Usage 105
- Downloads 105
- PhilSci-Archive 105
- Repository URL:
- Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
The aim of this paper is to present a new logic-based understanding of the connection between classical kinematics and relativistic kinematics. We show that the axioms of special relativity can be interpreted in the language of classical kinematics. This means that there is a logical translation function from the language of special relativity to the language of classical kinematics which translates the axioms of special relativity into consequences of classical kinematics. We will also show that if we distinguish a class of observers (representing observers stationary with respect to the “Ether”) in special relativity and exclude the non-slower-than light observers from classical kinematics by an extra axiom, then the two theories become deﬁnitionally equivalent (i.e., they become equivalent theories in the sense as the theory of lattices as algebraic structures is the same as the theory of lattices as partially ordered sets). Furthermore, we show that classical kinematics is deﬁnitionally equivalent to classical kinematics with only slower-than-light inertial observers, and hence by transitivity of deﬁnitional equivalence that special relativity theory extended with “Ether” is deﬁnitionally equivalent to classical kinematics. So within an axiomatic framework of mathematical logic, wee xplicitly show that the transition from classical kinematics to relativistic kinematics is the knowledge acquisition that there is no “Ether”, accompanied by a redeﬁnition of the concepts of time and space.