Cladistic Parsimony, Historical Linguistics and Cultural Phylogenetics: Cladistic Parsimony, Linguistics, Phylogenetics

Citation data:

Mind & Language, ISSN: 0268-1064, Vol: 32, Issue: 1, Page: 65-100

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 170
Downloads 126
Abstract Views 39
Link-outs 5
Captures 8
Readers 7
Exports-Saves 1
Social Media 8
Tweets 8
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13276
DOI:
10.1111/mila.12133
Author(s):
Cabrera, Frank
Publisher(s):
Wiley-Blackwell
Tags:
Arts and Humanities; Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Here, I consider the recent application of phylogenetic methods in historical linguistics. After a preliminary survey of one such method, i.e. cladistic parsimony, I respond to two common criticisms of cultural phylogenies: (1) that cultural artifacts cannot be modeled as tree-like because of borrowing across lineages, and (2) that the mechanism of cultural change differs radically from that of biological evolution. I argue that while perhaps (1) remains true for certain cultural artifacts, the nature of language may be such as to side-step this objection. Moreover, I explore the possibility that cladistic parsimony can be justified even if (2) is true by appealing to the inference pattern known among philosophers as ‘Inference to the Best Explanation’ (IBE).