Cladistic Parsimony, Historical Linguistics and Cultural Phylogenetics: Cladistic Parsimony, Linguistics, Phylogenetics

Citation data:

Mind & Language, ISSN: 0268-1064, Vol: 32, Issue: 1, Page: 65-100

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 68
Downloads 35
Abstract Views 29
Link-outs 4
Captures 5
Readers 4
Exports-Saves 1
Social Media 7
Tweets 7
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13276
DOI:
10.1111/mila.12133
Author(s):
Frank Cabrera
Publisher(s):
Wiley-Blackwell
Tags:
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Here, I consider the recent application of phylogenetic methods in historical linguistics. After a preliminary survey of one such method, i.e. cladistic parsimony, I respond to two common criticisms of cultural phylogenies: (1) that cultural artifacts cannot be modeled as tree-like because of borrowing across lineages, and (2) that the mechanism of cultural change differs radically from that of biological evolution. I argue that while perhaps (1) remains true for certain cultural artifacts, the nature of language may be such as to side-step this objection. Moreover, I explore the possibility that cladistic parsimony can be justified even if (2) is true by appealing to the inference pattern known among philosophers as ‘Inference to the Best Explanation’ (IBE).

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.