Expert Judgment for Climate Change Adaptation

Citation data:

Philosophy of Science, ISSN: 0031-8248, Vol: 83, Issue: 5, Page: 1110-1121

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 75
Downloads 39
Abstract Views 26
Link-outs 10
Captures 7
Readers 5
Exports-Saves 2
Social Media 3
Tweets 3
Citations 2
Citation Indexes 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13277
DOI:
10.1086/687942
Author(s):
Thompson, Erica; Frigg, Roman; Helgeson, Casey
Publisher(s):
University of Chicago Press; Chicago University Press
Tags:
Arts and Humanities
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Climate change adaptation is largely a local matter, and adaptation planning can benefit from local climate change projections. Such projections are typically generated by accepting climate model outputs in a relatively uncritical way. We argue, based on the IPCC’s treatment of model outputs from the CMIP5 ensemble, that this approach is unwarranted and that subjective expert judgment should play a central role in the provision of local climate change projections intended to support decision-making.