Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13285
Author(s):
Ruth Kastner
Publisher(s):
World Scientific
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
It is argued that Niels Bohr ultimately arrived at positivistic and antirealist-flavored statements because of weaknesses in his initial objective of accounting for measurement in physical terms. Bohr’s investigative approach faced a dilemma, the choices being (i) conceptual inconsistency or (ii) taking the classical realm as primitive. In either case, Bohr’s ‘Complementarity’ does not adequately explain or account for the emergence of a macroscopic, classical domain from a microscopic domain described by quantum mechanics. A diagnosis of the basic problem is offered, and an alternative way forward is indicated.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.