Gödel's Argument for Cantorian Cardinality: Gödel's Argument for Cantorian Cardinality

Citation data:

Noûs, ISSN: 0029-4624

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 20
Downloads 20
Social Media 23
Shares, Likes & Comments 17
Tweets 6
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13390
DOI:
10.1111/nous.12221
Author(s):
Matthew W. Parker
Publisher(s):
Wiley-Blackwell, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
On the first page of “What is Cantor’s Continuum Problem?”, Gödel argues that Cantor’s theory of cardinality, where a bijection implies equal number, is in some sense uniquely determined. The argument, involving a thought experiment with sets of physical objects, is initially persuasive, but recent authors have developed alternative theories of cardinality that are consistent with the standard set theory ZFC and have appealing algebraic features that Cantor’s powers lack, as well as some promise for applications. Here we diagnose Gödel’s argument, showing that it fails in two important ways: (i) Its premises are not sufficiently compelling to discredit countervailing intuitions and pragmatic considerations, nor pluralism, and (ii) its final inference, from the superiority of Cantor’s theory as applied to sets of changeable physical objects to the unique acceptability of that theory for all sets, is irredeemably invalid.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.