The Value of Weather Event Science for Pending Climate Policy Decisions

Citation data:

Ethics, Policy & Environment, ISSN: 2155-0085, Vol: 20, Issue: 3, Page: 263-278

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 41
Downloads 40
Abstract Views 1
Social Media 4
Tweets 4
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/13498
DOI:
10.1080/21550085.2017.1374023
Author(s):
Justin Donhauser
Publisher(s):
Informa UK Limited
Tags:
Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, Environmental Science
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
This essay furthers debate about the burgeoning science of Probabilistic Event Attribution (PEA) and its relevance to imminent climate policy decisions. It critically examines Allen Thompson and Friederike Otto’s recent arguments concerning the implications of PEA studies for how the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) policy framework should be revised during the 2016 ‘review and decision’. I show that their contention that PEA studies cannot usefully inform decision-making about adaptation policies and strategies is misguided and argue that the current UNFCCC treaty, the ‘Paris Agreement’, supersedes their proposed revision.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.