Response to Belot's "Whose Devil? Which Details?"

Publication Year:
2004
Usage 587
Downloads 587
Social Media 2
Tweets 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1623
Author(s):
Batterman, Robert
preprint description
I respond to Belot's argument and defend the view that sometimes "fundamental" are explanatorily inadequate and need to be supplemented with certain aspects of less fundamental "theories emeritus."