Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2672
Author(s):
Griffiths, Paul E
preprint description
I defend the view that many biological categories are defined by homology against a series of arguments designed to show that all biological categories are defined, at least in part, by selection function. I show that categories of homology are 'abnormality inclusive' – something often alleged to be unique to selected function categories. I show that classifications by selected function are logically dependent on classifications by homology, but not vice-versa. Finally, I reject the view that biologists must use considerations of selected function to abstract away from variation and pathology to form a canonical description of a class of biological systems.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.