The Unreliability of Naive Introspection

Publication Year:
2006
Usage 1150
Downloads 1150
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/2965
Author(s):
Schwitzgebel, Eric
conference paper description
We are prone to gross error, even in favorable circumstances of extended reflection, about our own ongoing conscious experience, our current phenomenology. Even in this apparently privileged domain, our self-knowledge is faulty and untrustworthy. Examples highlighted in this paper include: emotional experience, peripheral vision, and the phenomenology of thought. Philosophical foundationalism supposing that we infer an external world from secure knowledge of our own consciousness is almost exactly backward.