Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3000
Author(s):
Goodwin, William Mark
conference paper description
This paper evaluates a general argument for the conclusion that visual representations in science must play the role of truth bearers if they are to figure as legitimate components of scientific arguments and explanations. The argument is found to be unsound. An alternative approach to assessing the role of visual representations in science is exemplified by an examination of the role of structural formulas in organic chemistry. Structural formulas are found not to play the role of truth bearers; nonetheless, they contribute to the arguments and explanations of organic chemistry.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.