Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/380
Author(s):
Norton, John D.
preprint description
How can we reconcile two claims that are now both widely accepted: Kretschmann's claim that a requirement of general covariance is physically vacuous and the standard view that the general covariance of general relativity expresses the physically important diffeomorphism gauge freedom of general relativity? I urge that both claims can be held without contradiction if we attend to the context in which each is made.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.