Some Worries for Norton’s Material Theory of Induction

Publication Year:
Usage 674
Downloads 674
Social Media 1
Shares, Likes & Comments 1
Repository URL:
Ducheyne, Steffen
preprint description
In this essay, I take the role as friendly commentator and call attention to three potential worries for John D. Norton’s material theory of induction (Norton, 2003). I attempt to show (1) that his “principle argument” is based on a false dichotomy, (2) that the idea that facts ultimately derive their license from matters of fact is debatable, and (3) that one of the core implications of his theory is untenable for historical and fundamental reasons.