Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4332
Author(s):
Maarten Van Dyck
conference paper description
I show why Michael Friedman’s idea that we should view new constitutive frameworks introduced in paradigm-change as members of a convergent series, introduces an uncomfortable tension in his views. It cannot be justified on realist grounds, as this would compromise his Kantian perspective, but his own appeal to a Kantian regulative ideal of reason cannot do the job either. I then explain how to make better sense of the rationality of paradigm-change on what I take to Friedman’s own terms.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.