Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/4517
Author(s):
Goodwin, William
conference paper description
In this paper I argue that the appropriate analogy for “understanding what makes simulation results reliable” in Global Climate Modeling is not with scientific experimentation or measurement, but—at least in the case of the use of global climate models for policy development—with the applications of science in engineering design problems. The prospects for using this analogy to argue for the quantitative reliability of GCMs are assessed and compared with other potential strategies.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.