Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5076
Author(s):
Lucía Lewowicz
preprint description
In this paper, I challenge the long-established view that the term phlogiston fails to refer. After a close examination of the reference of phlogiston during Lavoisier’s Chemical Revolution, I show that it referred throughout to a natural substance, fire matter. I state that Lavoisier eliminated the term but not its referent, which he renamed caloric, and I claim that it is in the historical and cultural context of the Chemical Revolution that the Lavoisier’s intentions can be understood.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.