Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/514
Author(s):
Lyre, Holger, Eynck, Tim Oliver
preprint description
Four empirically equivalent versions of general relativity, namely standard GR, Lorentz-invariant gravitational theory, and the gravitational gauge theories of the Lorentz and translation groups, are investigated in the form of a case study for theory underdetermination. The various ontological indeterminacies (both underdetermination and inscrutability of reference) inherent in gravitational theories are analyzed in a detailed comparative study. The concept of practical underdetermination is proposed, followed by a discussion of its adequacy to describe scientific progress.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.