Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/5272
Author(s):
Kilinc, Berna
conference paper description
My goal in this paper is to see the extent to which judgment aggregation methods subsume meta-analytic ones. To this end, I derive a generalized version of the classical Condorcet Jury Theorem (CJT), the aggregative implications of which have been widely exploited in the area of rational choice theory, but not yet in philosophy of science. I contend that the generalized CJT that I prove below is useful for modelling at least some meta-analytic procedures.

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.