Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/688
Author(s):
Peter B. M. Vranas
preprint description
According to Hempel`s paradox, evidence (E) that an object is a nonblack nonraven confirms the hypothesis (H) that every raven is black. According to the standard Bayesian solution, E does confirm H but only to a minute degree. This solution relies on the almost never explicitly defended assumption that the probability of H should not be affected by evidence that an object is nonblack. I argue that this assumption is implausible, and I propose a way out for the Bayesians.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.