Indeterminism is a modal notion: branching spacetimes and Earman’s pruning

Citation data:

Synthese, ISSN: 0039-7857, Vol: 187, Issue: 2, Page: 441-469

Publication Year:
2012
Usage 591
Downloads 548
Abstract Views 37
Full Text Views 5
Link-outs 1
Captures 1
Exports-Saves 1
Social Media 3
Tweets 3
Citations 10
Citation Indexes 10
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8631
DOI:
10.1007/s11229-010-9846-8
Author(s):
Placek, Tomasz, Belnap, Nuel
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature, Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Tags:
Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
The paper defends an Aristotelian notion of indeterminism, as rigorously formulated in the framework of branching space-times (BST) of Belnap (1992), against criticism by Earman's (2008) based on a model-theoretic characterization of indeterminism. It delineates BST branching against the background provided by Earman's (2008) distinction between individual versus ensemble branching. Partly in order to motivate our responses to Earman, it describes a construction of physically motivated BST models, in which histories are isomorphic to Minkowski spacetime. Finally it responds to Earman's criticisms leveled against BST by addressing a topological issue, the question of an actual future, the past/future asymmetry, and some semantical questions. © 2010 The Author(s).

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.