Indeterminism is a modal notion: branching spacetimes and Earman’s pruning

Citation data:

Synthese, ISSN: 0039-7857, Vol: 187, Issue: 2, Page: 441-469

Publication Year:
Usage 614
Downloads 571
Abstract Views 37
Full Text Views 5
Link-outs 1
Captures 12
Readers 11
Exports-Saves 1
Social Media 3
Tweets 3
Citations 11
Citation Indexes 11
Repository URL:
Placek, Tomasz; Belnap, Nuel
Springer Nature; Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Arts and Humanities; Social Sciences
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
The paper defends an Aristotelian notion of indeterminism, as rigorously formulated in the framework of branching space-times (BST) of Belnap (1992), against criticism by Earman's (2008) based on a model-theoretic characterization of indeterminism. It delineates BST branching against the background provided by Earman's (2008) distinction between individual versus ensemble branching. Partly in order to motivate our responses to Earman, it describes a construction of physically motivated BST models, in which histories are isomorphic to Minkowski spacetime. Finally it responds to Earman's criticisms leveled against BST by addressing a topological issue, the question of an actual future, the past/future asymmetry, and some semantical questions. © 2010 The Author(s).