Justifying Inference to the Best Explanation as a Practical Meta-Syllogism on Dialectical Structures

Publication Year:
2011
Usage 372
Downloads 372
Social Media 1
+1s 1
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8821
Author(s):
Gregor Betz
preprint description
This article discusses how inference to the best explanation (IBE) can be justified as a practical meta-argument. It is, firstly, justified as a *practical* argument insofar as accepting the best explanation as true can be shown to further a specific aim. And because this aim is a discursive one which proponents can rationally pursue in--and relative to--a complex controversy, namely maximising the robustness of one's position, IBE can be conceived, secondly, as a *meta*-argument. My analysis thus bears a certain analogy to Sellars' well-known justification of inductive reasoning (Sellars 1969); it is based on recently developed theories of complex argumentation (Betz 2010, 2011).

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.