Models as Make-Believe

Citation data:

Beyond Mimesis and Convention, ISSN: 0068-0346, Page: 71-96

Publication Year:
2010
Usage 366
Downloads 366
Captures 28
Readers 28
Social Media 3
Tweets 3
Citations 10
Citation Indexes 10
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/8931
DOI:
10.1007/978-90-481-3851-7_5
Author(s):
Adam Toon
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature, Springer (Springer Science+Business Media B.V.)
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
book chapter description
In this paper I propose an account of representation for scientific models based on Kendall Walton’s ‘make-believe’ theory of representation in art. I first set out the problem of scientific representation and respond to a recent argument due to Craig Callender and Jonathan Cohen, which aims to show that the problem may be easily dismissed. I then introduce my account of models as props in games of make-believe and show how it offers a solution to the problem. Finally, I demonstrate an important advantage my account has over other theories of scientific representation. All existing theories analyse scientific representation in terms of relations, such as similarity or denotation. By contrast, my account does not take representation in modelling to be essentially relational. For this reason, it can accommodate a group of models often ignored in discussions of scientific representation, namely models which are representational but which represent no actual object. 1

This book chapter has 0 Wikipedia mention.