Galileo's refutation of the speed-distance law of fall rehabilitated

Citation data:

Centaurus, ISSN: 0008-8994, Vol: 54, Issue: 2, Page: 148-164

Publication Year:
Usage 1328
Downloads 713
Abstract Views 408
Full Text Views 197
Link-outs 10
Captures 24
Exports-Saves 16
Readers 8
Social Media 3
Tweets 3
Citations 3
Citation Indexes 3
Repository URL:;
Pitt D-Scholarship Id:
Norton, John D.; Roberts, Bryan W.
Wiley-Blackwell; Wiley
Arts and Humanities
review description
Galileo's refutation of the speed-distance law of fall in his Two New Sciences is routinely dismissed as a moment of confused argumentation. We urge that Galileo's argument correctly identified why the speed-distance law is untenable, failing only in its very last step. Using an ingenious combination of scaling and self-similarity arguments, Galileo found correctly that bodies, falling from rest according to this law, fall all distances in equal times. What he failed to recognize in the last step is that this time is infinite, the result of an exponential dependence of distance on time. Instead, Galileo conflated it with the other motion that satisfies this 'equal time' property, instantaneous motion. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.