Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9171
Author(s):
Johannes Persson, Annika Wallin
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
conference paper description
We show that the common claim that internal validity should be understood as prior to external validity has, at least, three epistemologically problematic aspects: experimental artefacts, the implications of causal relations, and how the mechanism is measured. Each aspect demonstrates how important external validity is for the internal validity of the experimental result

This conference paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.