A Structuralist Theory of Belief Revision

Citation data:

Journal of Logic, Language and Information, ISSN: 0925-8531, Vol: 20, Issue: 2, Page: 205-232

Publication Year:
2011
Usage 414
Downloads 227
Abstract Views 171
Link-outs 16
Captures 24
Exports-Saves 16
Readers 8
Social Media 1
Tweets 1
Citations 3
Citation Indexes 3
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9580
DOI:
10.1007/s10849-010-9128-3
Author(s):
Holger Andreas
Publisher(s):
Springer Nature
Tags:
Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, Computer Science
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
The present paper aims at a synthesis of belief revision theory with the Sneed formalism known as the structuralist theory of science. This synthesis is brought about by a dynamisation of classical structuralism, with an abductive inference rule and base generated revisions in the style of Rott (2001). The formalism of prioritised default logic (PDL) serves as the medium of the synthesis. Why seek to integrate the Sneed formalism into belief revision theory? With the hybrid system of the present investigation, a substantial simplification of the ranking information that is necessary to define revisions and contractions uniquely is achieved. This system is, furthermore, expressive enough to capture complex and non-trivial scientific examples. It is thus closely related to a novel research area within belief revision theory which addresses the dynamics of scientific knowledge. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.