Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9620
Author(s):
Holly Andersen
Publisher(s):
University of Chicago
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Leuridan argued that mechanisms cannot provide a genuine alternative to laws of nature as a model of explanation in the sciences, and he advocates Mitchell’s pragmatic account of laws. I first demonstrate that Leuridan gets the order of priority wrong among mechanisms, regularity, and laws, and then make some clarifying remarks about how laws and mechanisms relate to regularities. Mechanisms are not an explanatory alternative to regularities; they are an alternative to laws. The existence of stable regularities in nature is necessary for either model of explanation: regularities are what laws describe and what mechanisms explain.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.