On the Empirical Equivalence Between Special Relativity and Lorentz's Ether Theory

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 1483
Downloads 1483
Social Media 4
Tweets 2
Shares, Likes & Comments 2
Repository URL:
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9871
Author(s):
Pablo Acuña
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
preprint description
In this paper I argue that the case of Einstein’s special relativity vs. Hendrik Lorentz’s ether theory can be decided in terms of empirical evidence, in spite of the predictive equivalence between the theories. In the historical and philosophical literature this case has been typically addressed focusing on non-empirical features (non-empirical virtues in special relativity and/or non-empirical flaws in the ether theory). I claim that non-empirical features are not enough to provide a fully objective and uniquely determined choice in instances of empirical equivalence. However, I argue that if we consider arguments proposed by Richard Boyd and by Larry Laudan and Jarret Leplin, a choice based on non-consequential empirical evidence favoring Einstein’s theory can be made.

This preprint has 0 Wikipedia mention.