Comment on Rule 14a-8(i)(9), Securities and Exchange Commission, June 30, 2015

Citation data:

Faculty Scholarship

Publication Year:
2015
Usage 66
Downloads 53
Abstract Views 13
Repository URL:
https://digitalcommons.du.edu/law_facpub/17, https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=law_facpub
Author(s):
Brown, J. Robert, Jr.
Publisher(s):
Digital Commons @ DU
Tags:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Rule 14a-8, Whole Foods, Law
paper description
The Securities and Exchange Commission has been analyzing its interpretation under Subsection (i)(9) of Rule 14a-8. This provision allows for the exclusion of shareholder proposals that conflict with those submitted by management. The staff has been examining its interpretation since instructed to do so by the chair of the SEC following a no action appeal in a case involving Whole Foods. A number of letters and memos submitted in connection with the review have analyzed the issue. At least one asserted that any change in interpretation required the Commission to go through the process of notice and comment. This letter asserts that notice and comment is not required, relying extensively on Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association.

This paper has 0 Wikipedia mention.