Friend or Foe? The Role of State and Mutual Fund Ownership in the Split Share Structure Reform in China

Citation data:

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, ISSN: 0022-1090, Vol: 45, Issue: 03, Page: 685-706

Publication Year:
2010
Usage 2085
Abstract Views 1228
PDF Views 650
HTML Views 127
Downloads 76
Link-outs 4
Captures 214
Exports-Saves 161
Readers 53
Citations 71
Citation Indexes 71
Repository URL:
https://works.bepress.com/mafirth/19, http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/1635
DOI:
10.1017/s0022109010000190
RePec URLs:
http://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v45y2010i03p685-706_00.html
Author(s):
FIRTH, Michael Arthur, LIN, Chen, ZOU, Hong
Publisher(s):
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Tags:
Business, Management and Accounting, Economics, Econometrics and Finance
article description
The recent split share structure reform in China involves the nontradable shareholders proposing a compensation package to the tradable shareholders in exchange for the listing rights of their shares. We find that state ownership (the major owners of nontradable shares) has a positive effect on the final compensation ratio. In contrast, mutual fund ownership (the major institutional owner of tradable shares) has a negative effect on the compensation ratio and especially in state-owned firms. The evidence is consistent with our predictions that state shareholders have incentives to complete the reform quickly and exert political pressure on mutual funds to accept the terms without a fight. Copyright © 2010 Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.