河南与香港工厂管理人员职业紧张对比研究 = Difference of occupational stress between managers in Hongkong and Henan province

Citation data:

劳动医学 = Journal of Labour Medicine, ISSN: 2095-9982, Issue: 1, Page: 12

Publication Year:
2000
Usage 1
Abstract Views 1
Repository URL:
https://works.bepress.com/siuol/168, http://commons.ln.edu.hk/sw_master/5457
Author(s):
Shanfa YU (善法余), Rui ZHANG (锐张), Oi Ling SIU (爱铃萧)
Publisher(s):
上海市疾病预防控制中心 ; 中华预防医学会
Tags:
河南, 香港, 管理人员, 职业紧张, Henan, Hongkong, Managers, Occupational Stress
article description
[目的] 探讨河南与香港两地工厂管理人员职业紧张方面的差异。 [方法] 采用职业紧张测试指标OSI-2和工作心理控制源量表测量工作紧张因素、紧张结局、心理控制源水平和其它相关因素。 [结果] 香港管理人员工作紧张因素评分、忍耐性和应付策略评分均显著性高于河南的管理人员 (P0.10)。河南管理人员竞争性、心理控制源、信心充足、对工作组织的满意感和躯体健康感评分显著性高于香港人员 (P0.05),工作满意感的主要影响因素为工作心理控制源 (R2>0.10)。 [结论] 香港管理人员在工作中经历的紧张程度比河南管理人员大。 Objective: To explore the difference of occupational stress in factory managers between Hongkong and Henan province. Methods: To measure the job stressors, strains, Type A behavior, coping strategies and work locus of control using Occupational Stress Indicator (OSI 2) and Work Locus of Control Scales. Results: The managers in Hongkong had significantly higher scores of job stressors, patience and coping strategies than ones in Henan (P0.10). For the managers in Henan, the main predictors of mental health equations were drive, coping strategy and workload (R2>0.05), the predictor of job satisfaction was work locus of control (R2>0.10). Conclusion: The managers in Hongkong experienced much more stress at work than the managers in Henan.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.