Campaigning in Poetry, Governing in Prose. CES Working Paper, No. 123, 2005

Citation data:

Page: 16

Publication Year:
2005
Usage 249
Downloads 249
Repository URL:
http://aei.pitt.edu/id/eprint/9034
Author(s):
David. Coates
paper description
New Labour’s performance in office–as an orchestrator of economic and social change–is situated against, and evaluated by reference to, two sets of legacies: legacies inherited from the years of Conservative political dominance after 1979; and legacies brought to power by New Labour. The paper argues that the first set of legacies was deep and enduring, and threw a long shadow forward. It argues that the second set of legacies were highly coherent and intellectually informed, but cumulatively involved a diminution in the capacity of the state. The result has been a two-term government that is sufficiently superficially successful to win a third term; but which has yet seriously to transform the legacies it inherited: to our misfortune, and ultimately–in electoral terms–also probably to its own. This paper is based on my study of New Labour’s domestic policy–Prolonged Labour: The Slow Birth of New Labour Britain; I have also co-authored a study of New Labour’s policy towards Iraq–Blair’s War–which was published by Polity Press in 2004.