Academic Pharmacy: Where is Our Influence?
- Citation data:
American journal of pharmaceutical education, ISSN: 1553-6467, Vol: 81, Issue: 4, Page: 63
- Publication Year:
- Citations 2
- Citation Indexes 2
- Scopus 2
- Social Sciences; Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
- Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
To evaluate the talents of fellows from cohorts 1-10 of the Academic Leadership Fellows Program (ALFP). This was a descriptive analysis of previously collected ALFP cohort data reflecting the talents using the Clifton StrengthsFinder assessment tool. Data consisted of 295 fellows from the first 10 years of the ALFP program. The Clifton StrengthsFinder talents were aggregated and analyzed to determine talents (strengths) distribution and domain. The aggregate of the four domains were compared among ALFP fellows using a chi-square analysis with an a priori alpha of .05. Lowest frequency of talents was found in the influencing domain (11.2%), while the domains with the largest frequency of talents were strategic thinking (34.4%) and executing (31.1%). When looking at the specific talents within the domains among the ALFP fellows, achiever (in the executing domain) and learner (in the strategic thinking domain) were the most frequent talents, while command (in the influencing domain) and adaptability (in the relationship building domain) were the least frequent talents. Since the profession is deficient in the influencing and relationship building domains (command and adaptability talents, respectively), this could help explain our slow progress in moving the profession from a product-focused role to a provider-based role. Perhaps the profession should be using a strategy better aligned with our signature leadership domains of executing and strategic thinking and focus on being a member of the health care team by aligning with team-based care rather than obtaining provider status.