Façade damage assessment of concrete buildings in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake
Structural Concrete, ISSN: 1751-7648, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 3-13
2012
- 20Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The magnitude 6.3 earthquake that struck Christchurch on 22 February 2011 caused widespread damage throughout Christchurch's central business district (CBD), where a large proportion of the building stock consists of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. Damage to the façades of these buildings was a clear contributor to overall building damage. This paper presents the damage assessment of the façade systems of these RC buildings. A survey of 173 RC buildings in the Christchurch CBD is conducted here, focusing on the damage to the façade systems of the buildings. The survey covers only buildings greater than three storeys in height, excluding the majority of unreinforced masonry façades, the damage to which has been well documented. The façade type and modularity is classified for each system, as well as the connection type where possible. The level of damage to each façade is determined in terms of the following performance levels: Operational, Immediate Occupancy, Life Safety and High Hazard. Further investigation is also made into three precast concrete panel systems. These case studies examine the damage, detailing and construction practice of each particular system. Copyright © 2012 Ernst & Sohn Verlag für Architektur und technische Wissenschaften GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know