Unsupervised Learning for CT Image Segmentation via Adversarial Redrawing
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 12264 LNCS, Page: 309-320
2020
- 8Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
We propose a novel adversarial learning framework for unsupervised training of CNNs in CT image segmentation. It is motivated by difficulties in collecting voxel-wise annotations, which is laborious, time-consuming and expensive. It is conceptually simple, allowing us to train an effective segmentation network without any human annotation. Specifically, we design the generator with a CNN producing the segmentation results and a decoder redrawing the CT volume based on the segmentation results. The CNN is then implicitly trained in the adversarial learning framework where a discriminator gradually enforcing the generator to generate CT volumes whose distribution well matches the distribution of the training data. We further propose two constrains as regularization schemes for the training procedure to drive the model towards optimal segmentation by avoiding some unreasonable results. We conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the proposed method on a famous publicly available dataset, and the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092785413&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59719-1_31; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-59719-1_31; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-59719-1_31; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59719-1_31; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-59719-1_31
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know