Energy and Utility Management Maturity Model for Sustainable Industry
Mechanisms and Machine Science, ISSN: 2211-0992, Vol: 109, Page: 353-361
2022
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Energy management has becoming a priority for organizations to reduce energy costs, to maximize their profits with minimal resources used, to comply legal requirements and to strive to sustainable business. Energy management standards, such as ISO 50001, represent the good practice, but have certain limitations. Therefore, the energy management maturity models could be used in different engineering sectors as a tool for continuous improvement. Energy maturity models have been used as an instrument to assess the current state of an organization, to rank the improvement measures and to manage and identify the progress. This paper proposes the energy management maturity model that is ISO 50001 processes based and Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle organized. The model was verified in production organizations in Serbia, which shows that all maturity levels exist in practice. The conducted study was performed in 24 organizations in two years: 2019 and 2021, where overall organizations’ maturity levels had better ranks. The average maturity level in research sample was 3.44 (proposed model with 5 maturity levels). The Act process phase had average maturity level 3 and Check phase 4.31. In two years there is evident overall improvement of the maturity level scores for most of the analyzed organizations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85125256127&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88465-9_33; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-88465-9_33; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88465-9_33; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-88465-9_33
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know