Forecasting Longevity for Financial Applications: A First Experiment with Deep Learning Methods
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 1525 CCIS, Page: 232-249
2021
- 6Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Forecasting longevity is essential in multiple research and policy areas, including the pricing of life insurance contracts, the valuation of capital market solutions for longevity risk management, and pension policy. This paper empirically investigates the predictive performance of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) with Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architectures in jointly modeling and multivariate time series forecasting of age-specific mortality rates at all ages. We fine-tune the three hidden layers GRU and LSTM model’s hyperparameters for time series forecasting and compare the model’s forecasting accuracy with that produced by traditional Generalised Age-Period-Cohort (GAPC) stochastic mortality models. The empirical results suggest that the two RNN architectures generally outperform the GAPC models investigated in both the male and female populations, but the results are sensitive to the accuracy criteria. The empirical results also show that the RNN-GRU network slightly outperforms the RNN with an LSTM architecture and can produce mortality schedules that capture relatively well the dynamics of mortality rates across age and time. Further investigations considering other RNN architectures, calibration procedures, and sample datasets are necessary to confirm the superiority of RNN in forecasting longevity.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85126194325&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93733-1_17; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-93733-1_17; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93733-1_17; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-93733-1_17
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know