A Lattice-Based Aggregate Signature Based on Revocable Identity
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13656 LNCS, Page: 266-274
2023
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
In the practical application of identity-based aggregated signature schemes, the problems of singer’s key loss and signer’s identity invalidation often occur. This makes the identity-based aggregate signature scheme need to realize the revocation of the signer, and the existing revocation of identities method needs to rebuild the system master key. Combined with the revocation method proposed by Boldyreva [1], this paper improves the aggregated signature scheme to realize the dynamic revocation of singer’s identities. At the same time, in order to deal with the threat brought by the development of quantum computer to the traditional cryptosystem, a lattice-based aggregate signature scheme based on revocable identity is proposed in this paper.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85148689144&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20099-1_22; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-20099-1_22; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20099-1_22; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20099-1_22
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know